Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Conboy v. City of Medford
as 1:2022cv11973
Plaintiff:
Allison Conboy
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gale v. City of Medford
as 1:2022cv11932
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gale
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Fargo et al v City of Medford
as 1:2022cv11765
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Fargo, Kenneth Lanzilli, Paul Smith and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Ayala et al v. City of Medford
as 1:2022cv10115
Plaintiff:
Noel Ayala, Antonio Alvia, John Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Connors et al v. City of Medford
as 1:2021cv11748
Plaintiff:
Janet Connors, Kevin Krupcheck, Chris Mangan and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howard et al v. City of Medford
as 1:2021cv10497
Plaintiff:
John Howard, Mike Ford, Steven Silvio and others
Defendant:
City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10475
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gandolfo v. City of Medford and its Police Department et al
as 1:2021cv10325
Defendant:
Officers John Doe and Richard Roe, Lena Gasparro, City of Medford and its Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gandolfo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The City of Medford v. PURDUE PHARMA, LP et al
as 1:2019cv10262
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Mark Timney and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Medford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NWACHUKWU v. City of Medford, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2014cv10291
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON NWACHUKWU
Defendant:
City of Medford, Massachusetts, Officer Enos, Officer Lebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
