Cases 1 - 10 of 18
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. CUMMINGS
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
AVA MITCHELL
Defendant:
NANCY G CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
GRIFFIN v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM et al
as 2:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA GRIFFIN
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM, UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE and GLENN CUMMINGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUMMINGS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2019cv00348
Plaintiff:
CHRISANNA L CUMMINGS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWTON v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM et al
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
WARREN NEWTON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEM, GLENN A CUMMINGS, KATHLEEN DEXTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CUMMING et al
as 2:2015cv00370
Plaintiff:
JON R ADAMS
Defendant:
PAUL CUMMING and J NEWCOMB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PELLETIER v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
DAVID R PELLETIER
Defendant:
SCOTT R LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, SHAWN EMERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPOSITO v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A ESPOSITO
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, WENDY RIEBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INMAN v. CUMMING et al
as 2:2015cv00081
Plaintiff:
FRANK INMAN
Defendant:
PAUL CUMMING and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
