Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Davis v. Kijakazi
as 22-1892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIELLE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv11091
Plaintiff:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, DEB HAALAND, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Vineyard Wind 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Danielle D. v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Danielle Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Modeski, et al v. Summit Retail Solutions, Inc.
as 20-1747
Plaintiff:
IIESHIA MEYERS, JEREMY WILLIAMS, ARIELLE MONEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GIOVANNI ZAMMITO, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, NATHAN DAMBOISE, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees, JEFFREY WOLFERT, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated employees and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SUMMIT RETAIL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Danielle D. v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Danielle Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Modeski et al v. Summit Retail Solutions, Inc.
as 1:2018cv12383
Plaintiff:
Iieshia Meyers, Lauren Turnbull, Suad Asmar and others
Defendant:
Summit Retail Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Bank National Association v. Davis et al
as 1:2018cv10537
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Defendant:
Sharon L. Davis, Evangeline Davis, Mark Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
