Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Paynter et al v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12524
Plaintiff: Judy Paynter, Keith Sennefelder and David Lee Pratt
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation and Arietis Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2023md03083
Plaintiff: Shavonne Diggs, Brady Bradberry, Christina Bradberry and others
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation, Maximus Federal Services, Inc., The Berwyn Group, Inc. and others
LEE v. RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00258
Petitioner: ADAM DAVID LEE
Respondent: RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER
Not Classified By Court: MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Koplow
as 21-1638
Petitioner: DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Respondent: DANA WILLIAM, GERALD FABIANO, LAW FIRM OF PIERCE, DAVIS, PERRITANO and others
Appellee: LEO ROBINSON
In re: Koplow
as 20-1253
Petitioner / Appellant: In re: DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 20-1013
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2182
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2181
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2180
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID LEE KOPLOW
In Re: Koplow
as 19-2002
Defendant: NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NBC TELEVISION AFFILIATES ASSOC., WHDH-TV and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID LEE KOPLOW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?