Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cotto, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff:
STACY FOSTER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMIE KIMBALL, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN RILEY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General, TIMOTHY SHUGRUE, Berkshire County District Attorney and others
SULLIVAN v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2023cv00402
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E SULLIVAN, II
Defendant:
HARVEY NICHOLS, WIPO and SIR DICKSON POON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Cauger, Et Al v Texas Instruments, Inc.
as 1:2016cv10358
Plaintiff:
James W Cauger , George Bergman , Ismenia Bernardo and others
Defendant:
Texas Instruments, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan III v. 3M Company
as 1:2015cv13149
Defendant:
3M Company , Inge G. Thulin and 3M Electronic Monitoring
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Sullivan III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sullivan III v. Melia
as 1:2015cv12686
Plaintiff:
Daniel E Sullivan III
Defendant:
Melissa Melia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan, III v. Flaherty et al
as 1:2014cv14299
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Sullivan, III
Defendant:
Caitlin E. Flaherty, Kevin Morris, Kimberly Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SULLIVAN v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E SULLIVAN, II
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS and UNKNOWN CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL CORRECTIONS OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv11412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sullivan-Kelly v. Bank of America, N.A.,
as 1:2007cv10098
Plaintiff:
Mary E Sullivan-Kelly and Mary E Sullivan-Kelly
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
