Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Arcell, et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 23-1897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE R. ARCELL, JOSE M. BRITO, JAN-MARIE BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY NIEBOR, GABRIEL GARAVANIAN and JUNE STANSBURY
Defendant / Appellee:
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION and SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES, UNITED AIRLINES, INC., SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. and others
Garavanian et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation, et al
as 1:2023cv10678
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Garavanian, Katherine R. Arcell, Jose M. Brito and others
Defendant:
Jet Blue Airways Corporation and Spirit Airlines Inc
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Haugen v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11480
Defendant:
Curtis Feeny, Kunal S. Kamlani, Staples, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leif Haugen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bushanksy v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11464
Defendant:
Curtis Feeny, Kunal S. Kamlani, Staples, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushanksy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Huntley v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11467
Defendant:
Curtis F. Feeny, Shira D. Goodman, Kunal S. Kamlani and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Huntley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Haag v. Staples, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11447
Defendant:
Arch Merger Sub Inc., Curtis Feeny, Kunal S. Kamlani and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Haag
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Faust v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2014cv13295
Plaintiff:
James B. Faust
Defendant:
Steven Tompkins, Yolanda Smith, Luis S. Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faust v. Cousins et al
as 1:2013cv12032
Plaintiff:
James B. Faust
Defendant:
Frank G. Cousins, Michael Marks, Jason Faro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faust v. Horgan et al
as 1:2012cv12166
Plaintiff:
James B. Faust
Defendant:
Gerard Horgan, Joseph Crusby, Maria Romero-Carbone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
