Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity
Interested Party:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. Conservation Law Foundation, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Appellant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Cogley v. State of Rhode Island, et al
as 24-1309
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COGLEY
Defendant:
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, LINCOLN D. CHAFEE, Rhode Island Governor 2013-2015 in his official capacity, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Rhode Island Governor 2015-2021 in her official capacity and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1220
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Appellant:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Interested Party:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and others
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1853
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Nantucket Residents Against Turbines, et al v. U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, et al
as 23-1501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NANTUCKET RESIDENTS AGAINST TURBINES and VALLORIE OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, DEBRA HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior and others
Interested Party:
NATIONAL OCEAN INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN CLEAN POWER ASSOCIATION
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Zarlenga, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORI ANN ZARLENGA, VICTORIA A. ZARLENGA, Decedent and LORI A. ZARLENGA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States, BARACK OBAMA, individually and in his official capacity as President of the United States and others
Seafreeze Shoreside, Inc., et al v. US Dep't of the Interior, et al
as 23-1473
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
US DEPT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, The Honorable, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT and others
Interested Party:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Zarlenga et al v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2022cv00372
Defendant:
Thrive Behavioral Health Center, Inc, United States Of America, George W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
Lori A. Zarlenga and Victoria A. Zarlenga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
