Cases 1 - 10 of 732
Hernandez v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2024cv30054
Plaintiff:
Angel Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Steven Tatro, Anthony Pioggia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harding v. Musk
as 1:2024cv10976
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cardoso v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 1:23-cr-10017-RGS
as 1:2024cv11409
Petitioner:
Kevin Cardoso
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harding v. US.Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2024cv10937
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
US.Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Page v. Sullivan et al
as 1:2024cv10814
Plaintiff:
Andrew Page
Defendant:
Justin Sullivan, Dumont Aircraft Charter, LLC, Dumont Aviation, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff:
Gerald Raby
Defendant:
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
Petitioner:
Douglas Buchan, Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Robert Falk
Watkins v. Chau, et al
as 1:2024cv11328
Plaintiff:
Ida Watkins
Defendant:
Stephanie Chau, Christopher Norris, Kevin Collins and others
Forshee v. Proule
as 1:2024cv10765
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forshee
Defendant:
Jonathan Proule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harding v. Amazon.com et al
as 1:2024cv10978
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Amazon.com and Jeff Bezos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harding v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10991
Plaintiff:
Kevin Harding
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
