Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Vose v. Kilmartin, et al
as 24-1066
Plaintiff: CARLTON VOSE
Defendant: PETER F. KILMARTIN, GERALD J. COYNE, PATRICIA K. ROCHA and others
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1840
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity, JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity and others
In Re: Oliver
as 23-1184
Petitioner: THOMAS OLIVER
Respondent: JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, MATTHEW H. MICHAUD, individually and in his official capacity, DOUGLAS H. SMITH, individually and in his official capacity and others
In Re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Lit We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1517
Plaintiff / Appellant: HEATHER PERHAM, individually and on behalf of her minor child, X.M., THERESA MILLS, HUGH MILLS, III and others
Defendant / Appellee: GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Defendant: SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., SANDOZ, INC., PROVIDENCE HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE, PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C. and PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA
Kando v. RI Board of Elections, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-1635
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT KANDO
Defendant - Appellee: RHODE ISLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RICHARD DUBOIS, Individually and in his official capacity as Chair of the Board of Elections, DIANE L. MEDEROS, Individually and in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Elections and others
King v. Burton, et al
as 16-2024
Plaintiff - Appellant: PATRICK KING, Captain
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN BURTON, Individually and Chair Board of and member of Selectmen, MICHAEL SANTORO, Individually and Chair Board of and member of Selectmen, GREGORY COOGAN, Individually and Chair Board of and member of Selectmen and others
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?