Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hadley v. Capone et al
as 1:2024cv10520
Plaintiff:
Laura A. Hadley, Devol Pond Association, The 2021 Hadley Family Real Estate Trust and others
Defendant:
Chris Capone, Paul Joncas, Pamela Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bauer et al v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard Corporation), et al.
as 1:2024cv10404
Plaintiff:
Alan Joseph Bauer, Douglas S. Rabin, Vivian Steir Rabin and others
Defendant:
President and Fellows of Harvard College (Harvard Corporation) and The Honorable and Reverend The Board of Overseers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Warren v. Zapata Computing, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13197
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Warren
Defendant:
Zapata Computing, Inc., Christopher Savoie and Mimi Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 13-1423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
CHARLES MOORE
Interested Party:
MARC A. WHALEY, BOURNEWOOD HOSPITAL, IRINA MEZEHBOUSKY, MD and others
Shu Wong v. MA Dept of Social Services, et al
as 12-1892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHU SHEAN WONG
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, a/k/a Department of Children and Families, JOY HART, BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER and others
Interested Party - Appellee:
PAULA AENNGER, THEA A. STEWART, ST. MARY'S CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN and others
US v. Flores-Rivera
as 10-1434
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
SONIA N. FLORES-RIVERA, a/k/a Mimi
Lay et al v. Lowell, City of et al
as 1:2007cv10984
Plaintiff:
Dara Lay, Meng Hor, George Pak and others
Defendant:
Lowell, City of, William S. Martin, Jr, Lowell School Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
