Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Smith v. Krupp, et al
as 23-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER B. KRUPP, Judge, Norfolk Superior Court, THOMAS CONNORS, Judge, Norfolk Superior Court, PETER J. RUBIN, Justice, MA Appeals Court and others
Clark v. Eagle Creek Renewable Energy LLC
as 1:2018cv10211
Plaintiff:
Peter B Clark
Defendant:
Eagle Creek Renewable Energy LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pitroff et al v. Charland et al
as 1:2016cv00522
Plaintiff:
Mark Brighton, Joanna N. Brode, Ramona Charland and others
Defendant:
NH, State of, Portsmouth, NH, City of and USA
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2015mc91412
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
Peter B. Sheldon
Noel v. Meyers et al
as 1:2013cv12683
Plaintiff:
Holly Noel
Defendant:
Daniel Meyers, Kenneth Klipper, Peter S. Drotch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood, et al v. Phillips et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Defendant:
Alice Peck Day Hospital, Cottage Hospital, Medtronic, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Celeste D. Wood and Thomas M. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1673
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ellis v. U.S. Department of Defense
as 1:2010cv10824
Plaintiff:
Peter B. Ellis
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Bouvier v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2009cv10865
Plaintiff:
Carla Bouvier
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Jim McGarrigle, Perry Lee Tavares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pennington v. Tarr, et al
as 1:2008cv11027
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Pennington
Defendant:
Peter B. Tarr, Jack L. Kopinsky, Stephen E. Anbinder and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
