Cases 1 - 10 of 675
Berdecia et al v. Matos-Negron et al
as 3:2024cv01264
Plaintiff:
Nelson R Berdecia, Annia Berdecia and Ricardo Berdecia
Defendant:
Dr. Jose A Matos-Negron, Dr. Carlos E Marrero-Ortiz, Dr. Arlene Hernandez-Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
In Re Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation
as 1:2024cv11470
Plaintiff:
Judith M. Soderberg, Ray Peleckas, Michigan Laborers Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cedric Francois, Federico Grossi and others
Petitioner:
Teddy J. Kasnicki and Kristen Bernard-Hedgespeth
Ruiz-Romero v. Candelario-Caliz, et al
as 24-1348
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
HON. ANGEL CANDELARIO-CALIZ, HON. GINNY M. VELEZ-CARRERAS and SECRETARY OF JUSTICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO
Ruiz-Romero v. Toro-Velez, et al
as 24-1346
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
LISSETTE TORO-VELEZ and PABLO COLON-SANTIAGO
Ruiz-Romero v. Chief Marshal - Office of Summons Ponce, et al
as 24-1347
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
CHIEF MARSHAL - OFFICE OF SUMMONS PONCE, LISSETTE TORO-VELEZ, Court Administrator of Ponce Municipal Court - Judicial Center of Ponce and CHIEF - OFFICE OF ARRESTS & EXTRADITIONS, Ponce Municipality
Collazo v. Ruiz-Feliciano, et al
as 24-1478
Plaintiff:
ODETTE LOPEZ COLLAZO, MARITZA FONT ORTIZ and VERANIA CRESPO CRUZ
Defendant:
WILFREDO RUIZ-FELICIANO, LUIS VELEZ, NANCY LABOY and others
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of State of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1334
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO RUIZ-ROMERO
Defendant:
STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUERTO RICO and PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lopez et al v. Orange Lantern, Inc.
as 3:2024cv30035
Plaintiff:
Arianny Celeste Lopez, Abigail Ratchford, Andra Cheri Moreland and others
Defendant:
Orange Lantern, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
