Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brooks v. Pierce, et.al.
as 1:2014cv11899
Plaintiff: RICHARD BROOKS
Defendant: City of Lawrence, Massachusetts, DENNIS PIERCE, Norman C. Zuk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CAPITAL ONE VENTURES, LLC. et al v. TRUSTEES OF THE 303-309 MAPLE STREET CONDOMINIUM TRUST et al
as 1:2011cv12137
Plaintiff: CAPITAL ONE VENTURES, LLC. and Virginia Woods
Defendant: TRUSTEES OF THE 303-309 MAPLE STREET CONDOMINIUM TRUST , Laurie Dickson , Lois Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1664
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lopez, et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al
as 08-8045
Plaintiff - Petitioner: ABEL CANO, Individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated, KEVIN SLEDGE, Individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated, CHARLES DEJESUS, Individually and on behalf of a class of individuals similarly situated and others
Defendant - Respondent: LAWRENCE, MA, PAUL DIETL, In his capacity as Personnel Administrator for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, JOHN MICHAEL SULLIVAN, In his capacity as Mayor of the City of Lawrence, Massachusetts and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv11693
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?