Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Smith v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Steven L Smith
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Judge Denise Casper et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Judge Denise Casper and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith v. Legal Department Supervisor et al
as 1:2023cv10562
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Legal Department Supervisor, Civilian Mail Employee, Superintendent Responsible for Transfers at the Suffolk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. C.O. D.J et al
as 1:2023cv10518
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
C.O. D.J, Lt Langston, Lieutenant Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. ADS Carlos et al
as 1:2022cv11626
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
ADS Carlos, Supervisor of the Suffolk County Jail's Legal Department and Lina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Smith v. Currie et al
as 1:2022cv11321
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Haley Currie, Dennis P McManus, Robert J. Creedon, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Cahoon et al
as 1:2022cv10304
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Lieutenant Cahoon, Superintendent, Peter Monteiro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Daou et al
as 1:2021cv12056
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Margarita Daou, Sherry Hannen, Merdith Lobour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Monteiro, et al
as 1:2021cv11281
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Major Peter Monteiro, Lt Langston, Sheriff's Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Matthews
as 1:2021cv10780
Defendant:
Attorney Ryan J Matthews
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
