Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Crayton v. Boston Housing Authority, et al
as 26-2044
Plaintiff:
COREY CRAYTON
Defendant:
BOSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, ERNESTO SALVIN, Custodian, SHERRI ADAMS, Manager and others
Hernandez Iraheta v. Mullin et al
as 1:2026cv14128
Plaintiff:
Melania Yaqueri Hernandez Iraheta
Defendant:
Markwayne Mullin, Joseph B. Edlow, Sarah Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv14102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Tuvell v. Haley, et al
as 26-1961
Plaintiff:
WALTER EUGENE TUVELL, JR., PHD
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HALEY, (Husband/Father), AMANDA HALEY, (Wife/Stepmother), AUTUMN HALEY, ((Step)-Daughter) and others
Smith v. Daou, et al
as 26-1969
Plaintiff:
STEVEN L. SMITH
Defendant:
MARGARITA ZEID DAOU, M.D., Psy.D, of W.R.C.H., SHERRY HANNAN, L.C.S.W. of W.R.C.H., MEREDITH K. LOBUR, Det. PTWN. P.D. and others
Barros v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00605
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Barros
Defendant:
Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., Nancy Venter, Matthew Venter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv13880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Covel et al v. Town of Bedford et al
as 1:2026cv13754
Defendant:
Mohamad Aldon, Town of Bedford, John C. Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Covel and Silva Sarian Covel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
