Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12465
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Olivier v. Van Dan Bush et al
as 1:2024cv12402
Defendant:
Cheyenne Van Dan Bush, Commonwealth of Masachusetts, Auditor of the Commonwealth and others
Plaintiff:
Herve Olivier, Jr
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12378
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Parlon v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv11816
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Annapurna Balakrishna, Joshua S. Levy and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Parlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ferreira De Paula v. Denis Riordan et al
as 1:2024cv12188
Defendant:
Director Terri A Robinson, Denis Riordan, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
Nikolas Ferreira De Paula
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
