Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Bryan v. Secretary of State, NH, State of
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Naseef Bryan, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary of State, NH, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Briggs, et al v. Scanlan
as 24-1316
Plaintiff:
LYNN-DIANE BRIGGS, WAYNE P. SAYA, SR. and KAREN TESTERMAN
Defendant:
DAVID SCANLAN, Secretary of State, NH and CHRIS AGER, Chairman, NH Republican State Committee
Interested Party:
NORMAN J. SILBER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hafner v. Mills, et al
as 24-1137
Plaintiff:
ERIC HAFNER
Defendant:
JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Maine Governor, AARON M. FREY, in his official capacity as Maine Attorney General, SHENNA BELLOWS, in her official capacity as Maine Secretary of State and others
Jorgensen et al v. NH Secretary of State et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jorgensen, David Testerman, Nikki McCarter and others
Defendant:
NH Secretary of State and NH Republican State Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Castro v. Scanlan, et al
as 24-1097
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY CASTRO
Defendant:
DAVID SCANLAN, New Hampshire Secretary of State and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv13113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
