Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1228
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1089
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Da Graca, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2117
Interested Party: OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner: JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent: THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Lib. Ch. of the Assemb. of God v. Pompeo, et al
as 20-1707
Defendant / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of Homeland Security, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LIBERTY CHURCH ASSEMBLIES OF GOD and LIBERTY CHURCH OF THE ASSEMBLIES OF GOD
Plaintiff: SAMUEL ROCHA
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Bhujel v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1510
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Acting Deputy Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: GYAN BAHADUR BHUJEL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12206
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?