Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11296
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10650
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Moitoza et al v. Ship Optimus, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11666
Plaintiff: Michael Moitoza and Valeria Moitoza
Defendant: Ship Opitmus, Inc., Ship Optimus, Inc., Gurinder Pal Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Perman et al v. Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust et al
as 1:2023cv10809
Plaintiff: Gerald A. Perman and Nessa Perman
Defendant: Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Kenneth R Leibler, Robert L. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10055
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
MCQUEEN v. SINGH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00276
Plaintiff: ANTONIO MCQUEEN
Defendant: RANJIT SINGH and AJ DHILLON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10741
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gros v. Kafker et al
as 1:2022cv10607
Plaintiff: Luis Gros
Defendant: Scott Kafker, James Lemire, Sabita Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
US v. Chandhok
as 22-1187
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ANGAD SINGH CHANDHOK
US v. Chandhok
as 22-1177
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: ANGAD SINGH CHANDHOK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?