Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff:
Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant:
New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant:
Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant:
United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant:
The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant:
BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner:
Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Silva v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00197
Defendant:
Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Southwest Holdings, LLC, Procter & Gamble and others
Plaintiff:
Maria Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Conroy v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 1:2018cv00641
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company and Sudbury Lumber Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Conroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weiland v. Crane Co.
as 1:2015cv00029
Plaintiff:
Weiland, Jerome E. Weiland and Carole L. Weiland
Defendant:
Crane Co., Zurn Industries, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stevens v. Foster Wheeler, LLC
as 1:2014cv00157
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler, LLC , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
James Stevens and Suzann Stevens
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , Eckel Industries, Inc. and McNally Industries, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
A.Y. McDonald Manufacturing Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warren v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Frank J. Warren
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and The Dow Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Shepard et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation
as 1:2012cv00143
Plaintiff:
Roy Edward Shepard and Shirley Shepard
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Alfa Laval, Inc. , Anvil International, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Viad Corp. , The William Powell Company , Grinnell LLC and others
Cross_defendant:
A.O. Smith Corporation, A.Y. McDonald, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Makin v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2009cv00395
Plaintiff:
Janice Makin
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, AII Acquisition LLC, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Taylor, et al v. Airco, Inc., et al
as 3:2002cv30014
Defendant:
The American Chemistry Council, Goodrich Corporation, Honeywell International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
June A. Taylor, Russell H. Taylor, Dustin H. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
