Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Allen v. Lustig Glaser & Wilson, P.C., et al
as 16-1076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LUSTIG GLASER & WILSON, P.C., DEREK S. ROGERS, KENNETH C. WILSON and others
Defendant:
CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1456
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zimmerman, et al v. Puccio, et al
as 09-2250
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW ZIMMERMAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and KELLY ZIMMERMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIGHTON CREDIT CORP., BRIGHTON CREDIT CORP., of Massachusetts, BRIGHTON DEBT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LTD. and others
Movant - Appellant:
KAREN PUCCIO
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, U.S.A N.A., PROVIDIAN BANCORP SERVICES and others
Interested Party:
ROBB EVANS & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Interested Party - Interested Party:
SPENCER SAVINGS BANK SLA
Zimmerman, et al v. Puccio, et al
as 09-1416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW ZIMMERMAN, On behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and KELLY ZIMMERMAN
Defendant:
CAMBRIDGE CREDIT COUNSELING CORP., CAMBRIDGE/BRIGHTON BUDGET PLANNING CORP., CAMBRIDGE CREDIT CORP. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN PUCCIO and RICHARD PUCCIO
:
Andrew Zimmerman, et al v. Cambridge Credit Counseling, et al
as 09-1034
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW ZIMMERMAN, On behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated and KELLY ZIMMERMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CAMBRIDGE CREDIT COUNSELING CORP., CAMBRIDGE/BRIGHTON BUDGET PLANNING CORP., CAMBRIDGE CREDIT CORP. and others
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE BANK, CAPITAL ONE FSB, CAPITAL ONE SERVICES and others
:
Zimmerman v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp et al
as 1:2008mc00115
Plaintiff:
Andrew Zimmerman and Kelly Zimmerman
Defendant:
Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp, Cambridge/Brighton Budget Planning Corp., Brighton Credit Management Corp. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
