Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff:
Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant:
New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant:
Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant:
United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant:
The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff:
BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant:
BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner:
Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2022cv11532
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts, Inc.
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv11091
Plaintiff:
SEAFREEZE SHORESIDE, INC., LONG ISLAND COMMERCIAL FISHING ASSOC., INC., XIII NORTHEAST FISHERY SECTOR, INC. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, DEB HAALAND, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Vineyard Wind 1 LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Krick et al v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2022cv11032
Plaintiff:
Ronald Krick, Margareta Krick, Christopher Krick and others
Defendant:
Raytheon Company, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Lockheed Martin Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
DOE v. BENOIT et al
as 1:2020cv11579
Plaintiff:
J. Q. DOE
Defendant:
John Doe, DEFENSE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT AGENCY, DAVID H. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Emhart Industries, et al v. CNA Holdings LLC, et al
as 19-1563
3Rd Party Defendant:
ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, UNILEVER, BNS LLC and others
Defendant:
NEW ENGLAND CONTAINER COMPANY INC, ROBERT M. GATES, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Defense, MICHAEL B. DONLEY, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Air Force and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC. and STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, by and through the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management
Defendant / Appellee:
US NAVY, US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNITED STATES and others
Interested Party:
DOW INC., f/k/a Dow Chemical Company, RHODES TECHNOLOGIES INC and WIN NOREN
Rosario v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 3:2017cv01103
Plaintiff:
Myriam Yashei Rosario
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense and United States Navy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
State of Rhode Island v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Defendant:
ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
State of Rhode Island v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00667
Defendant:
ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management v. ACS Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00666
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island
Defendant:
ACS Industries, Inc., AGFA Corporation, AIW Wind Down Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
