Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bloom v. Campbell
as 1:2024cv10339
Plaintiff:
Gary Michael Bloom
Defendant:
William James Campbell, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Vasbinder v. Superintendent Streeter
as 3:2023cv30096
Petitioner:
William James Vasbinder
Respondent:
Superintendent Streeter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Georgius et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00553
Plaintiff:
JANE MCKINNEY GEORGIUS, WILLIAM JAMES GEORGIUS, JR and Jane E. McKinney Georgius
Defendant:
MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR US SALES, LLC, Getinge AB and Atrium Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunn v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2018cv00943
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Petitioner:
William James Dunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warner,II v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv30279
Plaintiff:
William James Warner,II
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jolly v. Randolph Police Department et al
as 1:2011cv11588
Plaintiff:
William James Jolly
Defendant:
Randolph Police Department and Norfolk County District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
RIGBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2011cv00110
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES RIGBY, JR
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JAMES et al v. INPECOS A.G. et al
as 3:2010cv02030
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JAMES , CECIBETH ESCALERA , CECILIA JAMES and others
Defendant:
INPECOS A.G., FIRST OIL INTERNATIONAL, Gad Zeevi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Copson, Jr. v. Astrue
as 1:2008cv12067
Plaintiff:
William James Copson, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
