Cases 1 - 10 of 16,125
MaCcormack v. Well Path Correct Care Solution LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Andrew MaCcormack
Defendant:
Well Path Correct Care Solution LLC, James Hwang and Therese E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. District of Columbia, et al
as 24-1401
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Gorbey, a/k/a Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, D.C. CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS, 2ND CIRCUIT FEDERAL COURTS and others
Gardner v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40067
Petitioner:
Robert Gardner
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Van Etten v. Child Support Enforcement Department of Revenue
as 4:2024cv40066
Petitioner:
Gregory James Van Etten
Respondent:
Child Support Enforcement Department of Revenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, WELLPATH LLC, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
HART v. ARCHER et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES HART
Defendant:
JUSTICE JENNIFER ARCHER, KATHERINE HUDSON-MACRAE, LINDA MASON and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alabi v. USA
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Fola Alabi
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Burnham v. Colorado Parole Board
as 1:2024cv11056
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
Colorado Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
