Cases 31 - 40 of 467
Behavioral Medicine Consulting, LLC, et al v. CHG Companies, Inc.
as 23-4047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE CONSULTING, LLC, a Montana limited liability company and KEITH BROWN, M.D., an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
CHG COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA CompHealth
Brown v. Flowers, et al
as 23-7006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTNEY BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGER FLOWERS, JOHN CHRISTIAN, Pontotoc County Sheriff and MIKE SINNETT
Bird, et al v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 23-8002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHESTER L. BIRD, RYAN A. BROWN and RICHARD B. DAGUE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING, DANIEL SHANNON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, MICHAEL PACHECO, Wyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution Warden and others
Antonetti v. Santistefan, et al
as 23-2009
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU SANTISTEFAN, FNU MARTINEZ, Warden, FNU BROWN, Warden and others
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 22-4007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALAND BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, PETE AGUILAR, in their capacity as United States House Representatives, COLIN Z. ALLRED, in their capacity as United States House Representatives and others
Biodigester v. Murphy-Brown
as 22-4117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHIBRO BIODIGESTER
Defendant / Appellee:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Kessman v. Smoyer, et al
as 22-1385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRADLEY C. KESSMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SMOYER, SGT. RYAN MYATT, DEPUTY CHRISTOPHER SMITH and others
Brown v. Powell
as 22-4106
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT POWELL
Brown v. Schnurr, et al
as 22-3183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DAVID BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SCHNURR, JEFFREY NEAL PETTIJOHN, TOD E. SWENSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
