Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Burbank v. United States District Court, et al
as 10-4126
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant: JAMES W. BURBANK
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, all Judges, UTAH STATE POLITICAL ENTITIES, UTAH TAX COMMISSION and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant: DALE NOLEN STEVENS
Counterclaim-Defendant: MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL, CURTIS RICHMOND, THOMAS SMITH and others
Counter-Claimant - Appellee: UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH, JOANN B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County Attorney, RICK HAWKINS and others
Gales v. Meeks, et al
as 09-3297
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY LYNN GALES
Defendant - Appellee: J. BYRON MEEKS, District Judge (Retired), MARK FRAME, county attorney and TIM O'KEEFE, attorney
Stearns v. Smith, et al
as 09-3110
Plaintiff - Appellee: DANIEL N. STEARNS
Defendant - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER SMITH, County Attorney for Cowley County, TOM CAMPBELL, Cowley County Sheriff Deputy and STEVE BUMPUS, Cowley County, Kansas, Sheriff Corrections Officer
Defendant: FLOYD E. CLARKSON, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF COWLEY, KANSAS, BOB G. ODELL, Sheriff of Cowley County and others
Stearns v. Clarkson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3103
Plaintiff - Appellee: DANIEL N. STEARNS
Defendant - Appellant: FLOYD E. CLARKSON
Defendant: THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF COWLEY, KANSAS, CHRISTOPHER SMITH, County Attorney for Cowley County, BOB G. ODELL, Sheriff of Cowley County and others
Buck v. Drake, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-4050
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD ALLEN BUCK, Rev.
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID DRAKE, Esq., JUSTIN HOYAL, Sgt., Detective, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office, BRIAN ADAMSON, Detective, Salt Lake County Sheriff's Office and others
Hall v. Witteman, et al
as 08-3299
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE MILAM HALL
Defendant - Appellee: DOUGLAS P. WITTEMAN, Kansas State Official, in his official capacity as Coffey County Attorney and individually and personally, PHILLIP M. FROMME, individually and personally, COFFEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, individually and personally and others
Hall v. Witteman, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant: GEORGE MILAM HALL
Defendant - Appellee: DOUGLAS P. WITTEMAN, Kansas State Official, in his official capacity as Coffey County Attorney and individually and personally, PHILLIP M. FROMME, individually and personally, COFFEY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, individually and personally and others
Burbank v. United States District Cour, et al
as 08-4097
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant: JAMES W. BURBANK
Defendant: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, all Judges, UTAH STATE POLITICAL ENTITIES, UTAH TAX COMMISSION and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant: DALE NOLEN STEVENS
Counterclaim-Defendant: MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL, CURTIS RICHMOND, THOMAS SMITH and others
Counter-Claimant - Appellee: UINTAH COUNTY, UTAH, JOANN B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County Attorney, RICK HAWKINS and others
Burbank v. United States District Court, et al
as 08-4092
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant: JAMES W. BURBANK
Defendant: UINTAH COUNTY, Political subdivision of the State of Utah, UTAH STATE POLITICAL ENTITIES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, All Judges and others
Counterclaim-Defendant: MARTIN TERRY CAMPBELL, THOMAS SMITH, DALE NOLEN STEVENS and others
Counterclaim-Defendant - Appellant: CURTIS RICHMOND
Counter-Claimant - Appellee: RICK HAWKINS, JOANN B. STRINGHAM, Uintah County Attorney, JOHN LAURSEN, Uintah County Deputy Sheriff and others
Nielander v. Board of County Commissioners, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-3092
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK J. NIELANDER
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF REPUBLIC, KANSAS, MARK NORDELL, JOSHUA PEREZ and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?