Cases 41 - 50 of 1,491
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States v. Crosby
as 24-3018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Oglesbee, et al v. Glock
as 23-5134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK OGLESBEE and KATHREN D. OGLESBEE
Defendant / Appellee:
GLOCK, INC.
Bellamy v. State of Kansas, et al
as 23-3259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE ALLEN BELLAMY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, KANSAS CIVIL SERVICE and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant:
STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
Luton v. State of Kansas
as 23-3263
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN D. LUTON
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Shaw, et al v. Smith
as 23-3264
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BLAINE FRANKLIN SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class, SAMUEL JAMES SHAW, individually and on behalf of a class, JOSHUA BOSIRE, individually and on behalf of a class and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIK SMITH, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Kansas Highway Patrol
Defendant:
DOUG SCHULTE, Master Trooper, in his individual capacity and BRANDON MCMILLAN, Technical Trooper, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
