Cases 51 - 60 of 187
Halley v. Callaway, et al
as 16-7081
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FRANK HALLEY, as Next Friend of J.H., a minor child
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHAN CALLAWAY, in his individual capacity
Defendant:
SARA HUCKABY, in her individual capacity, STATE OF OKLAHOMA EX REL. THE OKLAHOMA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, KEN GOLDEN, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Bryan County, Oklahoma and others
Coddington v. Royal
as 16-6295
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES CODDINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Postelle v. Royal
as 16-6290
Petitioner - Appellant:
GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Grissom v. Royal
as 16-6271
Petitioner - Appellant:
WENDELL ARDEN GRISSOM
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Underwood v. Royal
as 16-6262
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN RAY UNDERWOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Mitchell v. Royal
as 16-6258
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFRED BRIAN MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Goode v. Royal
as 16-5124
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE ROZELL GOODE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Lay v. Orman, et al
as 16-7060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ORMAN, Postal Agent, OSP, NEAMYRA RIDDLE, Postal Agent Director, OSP, ANITA TRAMMEL, Warden and others
Simpson v. Duckworth
as 16-6191
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENDRICK ANTONIO SIMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN DUCKWORTH, Interim Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Hobbs v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary, et al
as 16-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J. HOBBS
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA STATE PENITENTIARY, WAYNE BRACKENSEIK, AKA Wayne Brackensack, TERRY CRENSHAW, OSP Warden Assistant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
