Cases 71 - 80 of 140
Lynn v. Goddard, et al
as 16-3067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNNIE GODDARD, SAM CLINE, JOHN LANGFORD and others
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN B. HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Hamilton v. Boyd, et al
as 15-1401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAN BARTON HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES B. BOYD, Judge, PAUL METZGER, Judge, ERIN ELY, Judge and others
Bruce v. Denney, et al
as 15-3263
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE BRUCE
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DENNEY, Regional Psychology Services Administrator, MORRIS LEWIS, Regional Psychology Treatment Program Coordinator, PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director and others
In re: Morris, et al
as 15-1362
Petitioner:
JOHN OTIS MORRIS
Respondent:
BRIAN (I) BURNETT, Acting Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Carrillo v. Coffman, et al
as 15-1298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONSO CARRILLO
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity as elected Colorado Attorney General, RICK RAEMISCH, in his individual and official capacities, BOBBY BONNER, in his individual and official capacities and others
United States v. Ebeling
as 15-4068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MORRIS K. EBELING
Cockerell v. Morris, et al
as 14-2225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON KYLE COCKERELL
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU MORRIS, AKA Gerald Morris, SANDRA HOPKINS, Medical Staff and ROSE KEATON, Medical Staff
Morris v. Farri
as 14-7093
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRELL MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden
Robledo-Valdez v. West, et al
as 14-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG ROBLEDO-VALDEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JEWEL WEST, TRAVIS TRANI, DALE BURKE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
