Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lakhumna v. Messinger, et al
as 23-4044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIVEK LAKHUMNA
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. MESSINGER, Employee at Beaver County Jail and SHARITY SCHILTZ, Uintah County Jail
Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah State Tax Commission, et al
as 21-4083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN L. VALENTINE, Commissioner and Chair of the Utah State Tax Commission and THE STATE OF UTAH
Not Yet Classified:
BEAVER COUNTY, BOX ELDER COUNTY, CARBON COUNTY and others
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
George v. Beaver County, et al
as 21-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHY M. GEORGE, on behalf of the Estate of Troy Bradshaw
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAVER COUNTY, by and through the Beaver County Board of Commissioners, CAMERON M. NOEL, RANDALL ROSE and others
Union Pacific Railroad v. Utah State Tax Commission, et al
as 20-4093
Defendant / Appellee:
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, JOHN L. VALENTINE, Commissioner and Chair of the Utah Tax Commission and STATE OF UTAH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Intervenor / Appellee:
MILLARD COUNTY, BOX ELDER COUNTY, CARBON COUNTY and others
Sanchez v. Beaver County Sheriff, et al
as 20-4073
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMERAN NOEL, FNU HESSENTION, NERCE ROBEN AVORY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREG PAUL REVERE SANCHEZ
United States v. VanDam
as 10-4078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UTAHNS FOR ETHICAL GOVERNMENT, a Utah Political Issues Committee
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL B. BARTON, Beaver County Clerk, ROBERT P. PERO, Carbon County Clerk, DIANE FRESTON, Duchesne County Clerk and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
