Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Kelly v. Schnurr, et al
as 24-3019
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE J. KELLY
Defendant:
DAN SCHNURR, FRED EARLY, JOHN CANNON and others
Mays v. Grady County Jail, et al
as 24-6003
Plaintiff:
OTIS MAYS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY JAIL, GRADY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, FNU CARPENTER and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Johnson v. Brady, et al
as 22-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JUDGE JILL BRADY, JESSICA AGGSON, DAVID CHAPIN and others
Carpenter v. Vilsack, et al
as 22-8079
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEISL M. CARPENTER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of Agriculture and ZACH DUCHENEAUX, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Farm Service Agency
Lay, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY, by and through his next friend Rhonda Kemp
Plaintiff:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, RONSON KYLE BUSH, JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Sullivan v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority, et al
as 22-3117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, MICHELLE SAFFORD, BOB PAGE and others
Coddington, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
