Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Serna, et al v. Board of County Commissioners, et al
as 24-1150
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO SERNA and AJHALEI SNODDY
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF EL PASO, JENNIFER IRVINE and DENNIS BARRON
Serna, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1149
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO SERNA and AJHALEI SNODDY
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, WYNETTA MASSEY, DARLENE KENNEDY and others
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Lovos-Vasquez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9503
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO LOVOS-VASQUEZ, ROCICELA STEFANY MUNOZ-PEREZ and DIEGO LOVOS-MUNOZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Bedolla-Trujillo v. Garland
as 23-9546
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANCISCO JAVIER BEDOLLA-TRUJILLO
Respondent / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Guzman v. Garland
as 23-9542
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO JAVIER GUZMAN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
De La Cruz-Del Real v. Garland
as 23-9525
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO DE LA CRUZ-DEL REAL
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
