Cases 1 - 10 of 37
State of Kansas, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3097
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
MOMS FOR LIBERTY, STATE OF ALASKA, FEMALE ATHLETES UNITED and others
Amicus Curiae:
FLOYD ABRAMS, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Clark v. Garland, et al
as 24-3088
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in both his official and individual capacities, (FNU) (LNU), Unknown Government Agent #2, in individual capacity, (FNU) (LNU), Unknown Government Agent #5, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC S. CLARK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shao, et al v. Garland
as 24-9541
Petitioner:
ZHONGYAN SHAO and XIANGSEN MENG
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Barrales v. Garland
as 24-9529
Petitioner:
CASIMIRO ROMERO BARRALES
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Garcia Valladares, et al v. Garland
as 24-9523
Petitioner:
NADIA Z. GARCIA VALLADARES and EDIS Z. ESCOTO GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Carcamo-Perez, et al v. Garland
as 24-9512
Petitioner:
KAREN PATRICIA CARCAMO-PEREZ, JOSUE AREVALO-CARCAMO and EMELY AREVALO-CARCAMO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND
Lawrence v. Garland, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LAWRENCE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and PHIL WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Srader v. United States, et al
as 24-3001
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. SRADER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, FNU LNU (1) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
