Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Konecny v. State of Texas, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
McMurtry v. Dougherty, et al
as 23-1348
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGG PHILIP MCMURTRY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL T. DOUGHERTY, CARLOS RUEDA, JEFF GILLIO and others
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons ADMAX Superintendent Cus
as 23-1300
Petitioner / Appellant:
NORVELL CRUMP
Respondent / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, Weise/Robinson
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-705
Petitioner:
STEVE OKSTAD, MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA and others
Respondent:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC. and REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC.
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Austin v. Robinson, et al
as 23-1281
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY C. AUSTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN STEWART ROBINSON and SUSAN KAY ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
