Cases 1 - 10 of 305
Manning v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 24-5058
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MANNING, as the Administrator of the Estate of Terence Crutcher, Sr.
Defendant:
CITY OF TULSA and BETTY JO SHELBY
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Bond, et al v. Sheriff of Ottawa County
as 24-5035
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN P. BOND, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Terral Ellis, II, deceased, TERRAL B. ELLIS, SR. and SHELLY BLISS
Defendant:
SHERIFF OF OTTAWA COUNTY, in his official capacity, OFFICER JOHNNY BRAY and OFFICER CHARLES SHOEMAKER
United States v. Coulter
as 24-6026
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GERMAINE COULTER, SR., AKA Slim
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4150
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
JUAN AREVALO, an individual, LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, DAVID D. CARRERA, an individual and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH DELAROSA, an individual, ADELA MORRISON, an individual, STEVEN D. OLSON, an individual and others
United States v. Maytubby
as 23-7084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LANCE KEITH MAYTUBBY, SR.
Parker, Sr. v. Commissioner, SSA
as 23-3237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL EUGENE PARKER, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Biers v. Dentons US, et al
as 23-4147
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL L. BIERS, an individual and Chief Tribal Judge of the Te-Moak Supreme Court
Defendant / Appellee:
BRYAN L. BOWKER, in his official and individual capacity and JOSEPH MCDADE, in his individual and official capacity
Defendant:
LESLIE A. BERG-GROVE, an individual, KEVIN CLOCK, an individual, PAUL CONABLE, an individual and others
Cross Claimant:
STEVEN J. MCDADE, an individual
Reid v. Powell
as 23-4130
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRIAN SCOTT REID, SR.
Respondent / Appellee:
ROBERT POWELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
