Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Gardner v. Long
as 24-4063
Plaintiff: EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant: WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Gardner v. Long
as 24-4020
Plaintiff: EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant: WENDI LONG, in Her Official Capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Lakhumna v. Messinger, et al
as 23-4044
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIVEK LAKHUMNA
Defendant / Appellee: SGT. MESSINGER, Employee at Beaver County Jail and SHARITY SCHILTZ, Uintah County Jail
Gardner v. Long
as 22-4071
Counter Defendant: EDSON G. GARDNER
Counter Claimant: WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Gardner v. Long
as 21-4147
Counter Defendant: EDSON G. GARDNER
Counter Claimant: WENDI LONG, In Her Official Capacity as Treasurer for Uintah County, Utah
Gardner v. Long
as 21-4101
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee: WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer of Uintah County, Utah
Paugh, et al v. Uintah County, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-4067
Plaintiff / Appellee: TRISTEN CALDER, as personal representative of the estate of Coby Lee Paugh, DONALD PAUGH, as the heir of Coby Lee Paugh and NOLEEN PAUGH, as heir of Coby Lee Paugh
Defendant / Appellant: JUSTIN RIDDLE, DAN BUNNELL, TYLER CONLEY and others
Plaintiff: NOLEEN PAUGH, as the heir of Coby Lee Paugh
Gardner v. Long
as 21-4012
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee: WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer of Uintah County, Utah
Gardner v. Long
as 20-4128
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee: WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer of Uintah County, Utah
Gardner v. Long
as 20-4047
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDSON G. GARDNER
Defendant / Appellee: WENDI LONG, in her official capacity as Treasurer of Uintah County, Utah

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?