Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Schupper v. Cafasso, et al
as 17-1037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBYN CAFASSO, WILLIAM EDIE, JEANIE SMITH and others
Kobel v. Douglas County Jail, et al
as 16-3336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT HARRIS KOBEL
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY JAIL, (FNU) BUNTING, (FNU) HAGENBUCH and others
Schupper v. Cafasso, et al
as 16-1432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBYN CAFASSO, WILLIAM EDIE, JEANIE SMITH and others
Schupper v. Cafasso, et al
as 16-1325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBYN CAFASSO, WILLIAM EDIE, JEANNE SMITH and others
Schupper v. Cafasso, et al
as 13-1168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBYN CAFASSO, WILLIAM EDIE, JEANNE SMITH and others
Schupper v. Cafasso, et al
as 11-1212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBYN CAFASSO, in his individual and official capacity, WILLIAM EDIE, in his individual and official capacity, JEANIE SMITH, in her individual and official capacity and others
Schupper v. Cafasso, et al
as 10-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBYN CAFASSO, WILLIAM EDIE, JEANNE SMITH and others
Schupper v. Edie, et al
as 08-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANFORD B. SCHUPPER
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM EDIE, ROBYN CAFASSO, JEANNE SMITH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
