Cases 1 - 10 of 1,491
Richter v. Hatfield, et al
as 24-5084
Defendant:
ROBIN HATFIELD, JESSICA PITTS, AARIKA HOLT and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN D. RICHTER, Administrator of the Estate of Xander Cage Harris-Bruntmyer
State of Kansas, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3097
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK GARLAND, United States Attorney General, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
MOMS FOR LIBERTY, STATE OF ALASKA, FEMALE ATHLETES UNITED and others
Amicus Curiae:
FLOYD ABRAMS, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY and others
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 24-3114
Defendant:
TWIN CITIES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, DR. EDWARD PROSTIC, DR. STEPHEN NOLKER and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Crosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1300
Respondent:
A. CIOLLI, Warden, ADX and M. BANUELOS, Former, DHO
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. CROSBY
Victorino v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1272
Petitioner:
ANGEL D. VICTORINO
Respondent:
TERRY JACQUES, L.C.F. Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
USSEC v. Reven Holdings, et al
as 24-1309
Defendant:
REVEN ONCOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, BRIAN D. DENOMME, HEALTH ANALYTICS AND RESEARCH SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Pappas v. Moham, et al
as 24-1283
Defendant:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENT SHANNON MOHAM, ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER D. HUME and ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER EMELY CARRENO
Plaintiff:
WESLEY WAYNE PAPPAS
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Respondent:
A. CILLIO, Warden, K. MANDABON MARTINEZ, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Cosby v. Cillio, et al
as 24-1271
Respondent:
BOP, (NCRO), A. CILLIO, Warden, AW (PROGRAMS) COMPLEX and others
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, a/k/a Gregory D. Crosby
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
