Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Thomas v. Tulsa County Sheriff et al
as 4:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Bryon C Thomas and Byron C Thomas
Defendant:
Tulsa County Sheriff, United States Marshals, Joey Poffel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitts et al v. Newberry et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Colby Blake Fitts and Kayla Nicole Fitts
Defendant:
Don Newberry, Amy Strahan, Tiffany McDaniels Acting Head Teller doing business as Madison County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Parris et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
John Everett Parris, Rachel Marie Dallis, Jeffery Bryant Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00510
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travis et al v. Estate of Edward Jack Smith et al
as 4:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Shirley Virginia Travis, Sharyn Lee Davis, Pamela Jean Camp and others
Defendant:
Estate of Edward Jack Smith, Karen Snith Hendrickson, Monica Smith Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
It v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Anthony K It, Anthony Nkefiah and Anthony Bryant
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2021cv00558
Plaintiff:
Scott A Bryant
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Parris v. Bryant
as 4:2018cv00443
Petitioner:
William Gary Parris
Respondent:
Jason Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pettit v. Bryant
as 4:2018cv00387
Respondent:
Jason Bryant
Petitioner:
John Newton Pettit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
