Cases 101 - 110 of 5,745
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv03494
Plaintiff:
Susan D. Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Loewen v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Erik D. Loewen
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
CROCCO v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05281
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crocco
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
KOLINSKY et al v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv04232
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA KOLINSKY and SIDNEY ROSSI
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as CAN/3:24-CV-01796
Plaintiff:
Collins, Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Schermer v. Apple Inc.
as CAN/3:24-CV-01815
Plaintiff:
Schermer and Jared Schermer
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Hall v. Treasurer of the United States, et al.
as 24-3199
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant:
TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES, APPLE INC., T-MOBILE US, INC. and others
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS et al v. APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
as 2:2024cv05717
Petitioner:
LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 & 172 AND LABORERS LOCAL UNION NOS. 472 &172 WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS AND SAFETY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUNDS and ZAZZALI, P.C.
Respondent:
APPLE CORING & CUTTING CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
