Cases 21 - 30 of 42,297
v. Wade et al
as 2:2024cv00432
Defendant:
Jennifer Wade and Jerid Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Wade v. Millard County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wade
Defendant:
Millard County Sheriff's Department, Jerid Bennett and Millard County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lakey, et al v. Duggan, et al
as 24-7053
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA LAKEY and DOUGLAS LAKEY, as co-Special Administrators for the Estate of Jared Lakey
Defendant:
DAVID DUGGAN, in his individual capacity, JOSHUA TAYLOR, BRANDON DINGMAN, in his individual capacity and others
Lacour v. A&M Property Investment
as 24-6115
Plaintiff:
MELODY RENAE LACOUR
Defendant:
A&M PROPERTY INVESTMENT LLC, AKA Planet Plaza Apartments
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sholes v. City Council of the city of Craig colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01664
Plaintiff:
Tanner Sholes
Defendant:
City Council of the city of Craig colorado, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR MOFFAT COUNTY COLORADO,, Chip Mcintyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
