Cases 121 - 130 of 50,295
Marlow (PS) v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02428
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Marlow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander (PS) v. Martinez et al
as 1:2024cv02431
Defendant:
Michaela Martinez
Plaintiff:
Darrick Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Nash et al
as 5:2024cv03151
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Scott
Defendant:
Barbara Nash and Jhon Steckel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. USA
as 1:2024cv00879
Petitioner:
Mary Gonzales
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stephens v. Luna County Detention Center
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Celso Stephens
Defendant:
Luna County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McVicker v. Tuggle
as 6:2024cv00314
Respondent:
Terry Tuggle
Petitioner:
Keith Edward McVicker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Eufaula, City of et al.
as 6:2024cv00315
Defendant:
City of Eufaula, et al., Trent Casinger and Timothy Bryan
Plaintiff:
Ervin Ray Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Respondent:
Warden Molden, Wyoming Attorney General and Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Warden
Petitioner:
William R Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiegand v. State of Wyoming et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Joshua Wiegand
Respondent:
Wyoming Attorney General and State of Wyoming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins (ID 91202) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03120
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jennifer Lahn, Jeff Zmuda and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley L. Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
