Cases 31 - 40 of 246
Lopez v. United States
as 22-4115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY ERNEST LOPEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Navarro v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00987
Plaintiff:
Jim Navarro
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert Wilkie, Andrew Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris v. United State's of America
as 4:2022cv00485
Plaintiff:
Cole Walker Morris
Defendant:
United States of America and United State's of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lake v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02441
Plaintiff:
Bradley Allen Lake
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Morris v. United State's of America
as 4:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Cole Walker Morris
Defendant:
United State's of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. United State's of America
as 4:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Cole Walker Morris
Defendant:
United State's of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Cole Walker Morris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris v. United State's of America
as 4:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cole Walker Morris
Defendant:
United State's of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arroyo, et al v. Privett
as 22-1307
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW PRIVETT
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HALL, JOSHUA MOORE, TIMOTHY HOLCOMB and others
Arroyo, et al v. Holcomb, et al
as 22-1310
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE ARROYO, HEATHER BOEHM, SAMUEL CORDO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY HOLCOMB, DUSTIN ROSS and CHAD WEISE
Defendant:
ALEXANDER HALL, JOSHUA MOORE, ANDREW PRIVETT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
