Cases 1 - 10 of 154
Sipple Bey et al v. Meyer et al
as 5:2024cv04015
Plaintiff:
Gary Sipple Bey and Annette Sipple
Defendant:
William Meyer, Brian Hill, G. Jeffrey Records, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Monaco v. Watson
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Leopold Thomas Monaco
Defendant:
Elissa Watson, AirBnb, Inc., AirBnb RPG, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
v. Watson
as 1:2023cv01327
Defendant:
Elissa Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Mile Hi Foods Co., et al
as 23-1051
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAHMAL MILLER
Defendant / Appellant:
MILE HI FOODS, CO. and CHRISTOPHER C. WATSON
Defendant:
ALEXANDER H. TRUDDEN
Watson v. Amys et al
as 1:2022cv02400
Plaintiff:
Jack R. Watson
Defendant:
Randy L. Amys, Walmart Transportation LLC and Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Watson et al v. Mahan
as 5:2022cv00572
Plaintiff:
Earnest Watson and Wanda Watson
Defendant:
Lashanette Mahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle
Watson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
James Keith Watson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Stillwater City of v. Cephalon Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Keysource Medical Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Stillwater City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Mile Hi Foods, Co et al
as 1:2020cv03682
Defendant:
Alexander H Trudden, Mile Hi Foods, Co and Christopher C Watson
Plaintiff:
Jahmal Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Altus City of v. Cephalon Inc et al
as 5:2020cv01180
Defendant:
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc, Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc, Keysource Medical Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Altus City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
