Cases 31 - 40 of 1,542
Chang v. Rout et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Meng Uoy Chang
Defendant:
David Rout, Homeward Alliance Inc., Murphy Center LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce v. Kobach, et al
as 24-3008
Plaintiff:
MOREHEI PIERCE
Defendant:
KRIS KOBACH, JEFF ZMUDA and WILLIAM WADDINGTON
Davis (PS) v. Saint Anthony's Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Latonya Denise Davis, Curtis Meeks, Jr., Anita Jean Dilworth and others
Defendant:
Saint Anthony's Hospital, Heidit B. Lisa Patel, Lisa Heidit B. Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 198
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cole v. Melloy Group
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
William Cole
Defendant:
Melloy and Melloy Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Escalante v. Burmaster
as 2:2023cv02559
Defendant:
Paul William Burmaster and Paul Will Burmaster
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jacobs et al v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01060
Defendant:
Brandon Dewayne Clark, Mellissa Michelle Carroll, Amanda Carroll and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacobs and Ruby Handler Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romero et al v. Santa Fe County et al
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Barbara Romero
Defendant:
Santa Fe County, City of Santa Fe, Ceasar Ornales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
