Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Blankenship, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6053
Plaintiff: JOHN HAYDEN BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), HAYLEE BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), DELSIE MAY PYE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leon W Pye; (DC Grady Co. PB-2022-19) and others
Defendant: JOHN KEVIN STITT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ADAM LUCK, individually and as former Board Member of Pardon and Parole Board and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00408
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01089
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02013
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bronnenberg v. Eggar et al
as 2:2019cv00021
Defendant: Big Horn Basin Chiropractic, Park County Board of County Commissioners, Servicm Legal Services LLC and others
Plaintiff: Tami Mae Bronnenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duru v. HCA-Centennial Division et al
as 1:2018cv02237
Defendant: Robert Schreiner, Kaiser Permanente Georgia, Edkar and others
Plaintiff: Rose Adanma Duru
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00190
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. United States of America et al
as 2:2007cv00246
Plaintiff: Kamal Karna Roy
Defendant: United States of America and Washington DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?