Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Blankenship, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6053
Plaintiff: JOHN HAYDEN BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), HAYLEE BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), DELSIE MAY PYE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leon W Pye; (DC Grady Co. PB-2022-19) and others
Defendant: JOHN KEVIN STITT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ADAM LUCK, individually and as former Board Member of Pardon and Parole Board and others
Wood et al v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff: Amanda Wood, Nemelka, Linda The Estate of, Marjorie Charles-Scott and others
Defendant: State of Utah, Utah Department of Corrections, Brian Nielson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Blankenship et al v. Stitt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00958
Plaintiff: John Hayden Blankenship, Haylee Blankenship, Delsie Mae Pye and others
Defendant: John Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClellan v. State of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00931
Plaintiff: Karl McClellan
Defendant: State of Utah, Sherry Regan, Angela Miekolos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larsen v. Swallow et al
as 2:2012cv01223
Plaintiff: Paul D. Larsen
Defendant: John Swallow, Mark Shurtleff, Peter Corroon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tiedemann v. Garner et al
as 2:2008cv00882
Plaintiff: Edgar Tiedemann
Defendant: Curis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos, Keith N. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?