Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Chicharello v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2020cv01070
Defendant:
Navajo Nation Department of Dine Education, Tommy Lewis Jr., Tony Dearman and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. Chicharello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey et al v. Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2017cv01207
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Massey and Jacqulyn Massey
Defendant:
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Rick Rymerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey et al v. Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2017cv00516
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Massey and Jacqulyn Massey
Defendant:
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Michelle Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohn v. Jewell, et al
as 17-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AYINDE MOHN
Defendant - Appellee:
SALLY JEWELL, Secretary of the Interior, MIKE CONNER, Assistant Secretary of the Interior - Indian Affairs and JACOB J. LEW, Secretary of the Treasury
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00499
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00500
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Mohn v. Jewell et al
as 6:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
Ayinde Mohn
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Mike Conner and Jacob J. Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Massey et al v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00956
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Massey and Jacqulyn Massey
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Daniel B. Harman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
