Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Briseno v. Cozza-Rhodes et al
as 1:2015cv02186
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Briseno
Defendant:
Theresa Cozza-Rhodes, Jose Santana, Paul Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buhl v. Sproul et al
as 1:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buhl
Defendant:
R. Sproul, D. Stamper, K. Lincoln and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salim v. Holder et al
as 1:2013cv03175
Plaintiff:
Mamdouh Salim
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Charles Samuels Jr., Harrel Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Amin v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv02844
Plaintiff:
Jamil Abdullah Al-Amin
Defendant:
David Berkebile, Shon Kuta, Patricia Rangel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Womack v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2013cv01866
Plaintiff:
David Lee Womack
Defendant:
David Berkebile, Patricia Rangel, Darren Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2013cv00193
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Pam Butler, Drew Scarsborough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maxton v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2013cv00244
Petitioner:
Theron Johnny Maxton
Respondent:
TH Tozza Rhodes and Charles Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abdullah v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv00133
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Berkebile, Munster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Berkabile, et al
as 12-1363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID BERKABILE, CHARLES SAMUELS, NEWTON E. KENDIG and others
Murray v. Berkabile et al
as 1:2012cv02380
Plaintiff:
Greg Murray
Defendant:
David Berkabile, Paul Laird, Diane Krist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
