Cases 11 - 20 of 215
Eaves (PS) v. Kory et al
as 1:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Rodney Eaves and Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Kory, Jerry Roark, Danny Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Weston County Detention Center et al
as 1:2023cv00103
Defendant:
Weston County Detention Center Corporal, Weston County Sheriff's Department Officer Laramie, Weston County Sheriff's Department Officer Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sitsler v. Buss
as 4:2023cv00181
Petitioner:
Danny Joe Sitsler
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eaves v. Skramsted et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Skramsted, Vanessa Carson, Kory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reisman v. USA
as 6:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Reisman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Daniels v. USAO UT Dist, et al
as 23-4049
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY LYNN DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
USAO UT DIST, ANGELA MARIE REDDISH-DAY, UNITED STATES PROBATION FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH and others
Abbott v. Trujillo et al
as 1:2023cv00463
Plaintiff:
Patrick Abbott
Defendant:
Monique Trujillo, Cruz Soto and Danny Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Schlobohm v. Ash et al
as 5:2023cv03014
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (3), Donald Ash, (fnu) Fewell and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Charles Schlobohm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
